For US healthtech founders, product teams and integration leads
Connect your healthcare product to the right NextGen system. We distinguish Enterprise from Office, assess API or interface access, and build the patient, scheduling or clinical data workflow your customer needs.
Discuss my NextGen integrationFor healthcare software companies and practice technology teams. Updated October 15, 2026.
Confirm Enterprise or Office and the customer environment
Separate patient access from provider-facing integration
Check required routes, permissions and customer configuration
Test the workflow and give staff a clear exception path
Illustrative workflow · scope tailored to your environment
The short answer
NextGen Enterprise offers provider-facing JSON APIs with read and write operations alongside patient-access APIs. NextGen Office has a separate patient-access route. We confirm the product, program and supported actions before designing your integration.
Compare EHR integration methodsStart with the real problem
A request to integrate with NextGen can refer to Enterprise, Office or Mirth Connect. These require different work. We identify the actual EHR and workflow first, so a patient-access prototype is never treated as proof that a scheduling or clinical update will work.
Your starting point
Your product needs to identify a patient, retrieve permitted context or complete an appointment request in the customer system.
Your team needs an agreed set of patient records and a supported destination for approved output.
A prototype exists, but customer access, failed updates or reconciliation remain unresolved.
The Engineering Engagement
Workstreams are selected around your priorities. Each comes with an output your team can inspect, test and own.
Assess the Enterprise API program for provider-facing workflows. Map required patient, administrative and clinical operations to the routes available to your application and customer.
Scope the patient-authorized data your application needs using the applicable Office or Enterprise patient-access route. Evaluate scheduling writes separately.
Where the customer has the required interface, build message mappings, acknowledgements, retries and monitoring. Mirth Connect is an integration engine; it does not grant access to the NextGen EHR.
Keep credentials server-side, request the agreed permissions and limit patient data to the required fields. Define audit and retention needs with your team.
Exercise denied access, missing records, duplicate requests and failed updates. Confirm the customer configuration and operational ownership before rollout.
Expertise is in the decisions
Confirm Enterprise versus Office, patient-facing versus provider-facing use, the developer program and customer authorization. Check each required route rather than assuming Enterprise capabilities apply to Office.
Name each required operation and the system that owns its result. Confirm a write only after the source accepts it, with recovery for ambiguous responses.
Compare a direct vendor connection with an intermediary where appropriate. Check coverage, deployment needs, recurring fees and support ownership against the actual workflow.
Development cost depends on operations, mappings, customer configurations and failure handling. Vendor charges and onboarding lead time are assessed separately from engineering effort.
This service page describes work we can scope. It does not establish a vendor partnership, a pre-approved connector or a completed deployment for your customer.
Production permissions, commercial terms and clinical sign-off remain with the appropriate customer and vendor owners. We identify these dependencies during discovery.
From discussion to delivery
Agree the users, data, actions and access dependencies. Return a supported-operation map and an estimate with assumptions.
Build the selected connection and test ordinary requests and failures with authorized test data. Label sandbox results separately from production evidence.
Validate the agreed workflow in the customer environment, assign support ownership and complete the approved cutover.
We agree the scope, dependencies, acceptance criteria and commercial model before implementation. Your existing team can stay involved throughout.
Find the right starting point ↗They have different API offerings. We identify the customer product and the application audience before selecting a route. Enterprise write capabilities should not be assumed to apply to Office patient access.
No. Mirth Connect can route and transform messages once the necessary interfaces and permissions exist. EHR access and customer configuration must be established separately.
Your product workflow, customer system, required reads and writes, available test access and rollout scope. Please exclude patient records and credentials from the enquiry form.
We estimate after confirming the operations, data mappings and customer configuration. The proposal separates engineering work, vendor or intermediary charges and dependencies that affect delivery.
We can plan work and identify dependencies, but the rollout date depends on confirmed access, customer configuration and acceptance. We agree milestones after the access review.
We design request tracking, source confirmation and recovery around the supported API behavior. Staff receive unresolved requests with context; the agent should not confirm an appointment the source has not accepted.
Yes. We can scope a common application contract with adapters for each EHR. Available actions, permissions and customer onboarding remain specific to each system.
A useful first conversation
Tell us what exists today, who uses it and where the workflow breaks. We’ll discuss the scope, access dependencies and the next practical step.
A product overview and a de-identified workflow are enough to start. No patient records or credentials are needed.
These are independent reference sources, not endorsements. Applicability, platform access and current requirements are confirmed for your project.
